Car comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B)

2.0

237 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
VS

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 D5

225 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2015-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    223 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    237 hp
    177 kW
  • Lightest
    2,025 kg
    4,464 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    117 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5

  • Highest torque
    470 Nm
    347 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,224 km
    761 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Power
237hp177kW
225hp168kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
470Nm347lb-ft
Curb weight
2,025kg4,464lb
2,078kg4,581lb
Gross weight
2,445kg5,390lb
2,750kg6,063lb
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
85.7s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
97.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
35.9s
Calculated
43.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
867km539mi
Calculated
1,224km761mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,681mm184in
4,950mm195in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,776mm70in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,984mm117in
Front track-
1,676mm66in
Rear track-
1,679mm66in
Ground clearance-
238mm9in
Trunk volume
500L
368L
Max trunk volume
1,500L
1,886L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
71L
CO2 emissions-
152g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5PowerTorque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.05,000-6,800 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm7,050 rpm
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D54,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.9 s
43.2 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
237 hp
177 kW
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
225 hp
168 kW

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 has 12 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 12 hp (9 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
470 Nm
347 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2,025 kg
4,464 lb
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2,078 kg
4,581 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
223 km/h
139 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.06.9 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D57.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
867 km
539 mi
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
1,224 km
761 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
237 hp
177 kW
6.9 s
223 km/h
139 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
225 hp
168 kW
7.8 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,681 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
368 L
13.0 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.9 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheMacan I (95B)2.0VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Power
237 hp
177 kW
225 hp
168 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.8 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
2,025 kg
4,464 lb
2,078 kg
4,581 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,681 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
368 L
13.0 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Range score
867 km
539 mi
1,224 km
761 mi
CO2 score
-
152 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
368 L
13.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Macan I (95B) 2.0Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

  • Has 12 hp more
  • Is 53 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 132 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 357 km (222 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 D5
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
2.0
3.0 diesel V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
2.0 D5
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC402.0 D4
2.0
200t
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
2.0 D5
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
2.0 D5
S 3.0 Diesel V6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6
2.0 D5
JCW 1.6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014JCW 1.6
2.0
28i
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
2.0 D5
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 vs Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster