Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5vsVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003
2.5T 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score95/100
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 215hp160kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,594kg3,514lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 66.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,500km932mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,822mm190in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,434mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,562mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,560mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 440L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,106L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 5,200 rpm |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has 5 hp more than Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,594 kg 3,514 lb |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 7.4 s |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 7.3 s |
Although Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has more power, Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 215 hp 160 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,594 kg 3,514 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,500 km 932 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Is 64 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























