Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6vsVolvo S60 II 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight219 hp/t163 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range865 km538 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5
- Lightest1,542 kg3,400 lb
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,676kg3,695lb | 1,542kg3,400lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 45.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 69.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.9s Calculated | 24.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 865km538mi Calculated | 854km531mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,628mm182in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,100-5,100 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.9 s | 24.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 118 mph | 160 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 has 127 hp more than Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6: 127 hp (95 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 1,676 kg 3,695 lb |
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 4.7 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 and Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5: 2.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 865 km 538 mi |
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 854 km 531 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 367 hp 274 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,676 kg 3,695 lb | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 865 km 538 mi | 854 km 531 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 | Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6
- Has 127 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 2.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 63 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 11 km (7 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5
- Is 134 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























