Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6vsVolvo S90 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S90
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Lightest1,676 kg3,695 lb
- Best power-to-weight219 hp/t163 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range865 km538 mi
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score86/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,676kg3,695lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 45.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 61.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.9s Calculated | 18.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 865km538mi Calculated | 789km491mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,963mm195in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 177g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Volvo S90 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,100-5,100 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.9 s | 18.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 118 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 has 57 hp more than Volvo S90 2.0 T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 T6 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6: 57 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 1,676 kg 3,695 lb |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 4.7 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 865 km 538 mi |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 789 km 491 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 367 hp 274 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T6 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | VolvoS902.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,676 kg 3,695 lb | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 865 km 538 mi | 789 km 491 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 177 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 | Volvo S90 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6
- Has 57 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 254 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 58 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 76 km (47 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























