Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)

AMG C 43 V6

367 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2018
VS

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

Polestar 2.0 T6

367 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSedan2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    367 hp
    274 kW
  • Highest torque
    520 Nm
    384 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,615 kg
    3,560 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    227 hp/t
    169 kW/t
    4.4 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best performance score
    74/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.5 L/100 km
    22.4 mpg US
    26.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    865 km
    538 mi
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Power
367hp274kW
367hp274kW
Torque
520Nm384lb-ft
470Nm347lb-ft
Curb weight
1,615kg3,560lb
1,676kg3,695lb
Gross weight
2,225kg4,905lb
2,180kg4,806lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
44.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
45.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
4.7s
0-200 km/h
13.8s
Calculated
13.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
4.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.6s
Calculated
12.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
322Nm/t215lb-ft/ton
Calculated
280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
825km513mi
Calculated
865km538mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,996cc183cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,756mm187in
4,635mm182in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,426mm56in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,840mm112in
2,776mm109in
Front track
1,609mm63in
1,578mm62in
Rear track
1,546mm61in
1,575mm62in
Ground clearance-
124mm5in
Trunk volume-
380L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
68L
CO2 emissions
183g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V65,500-6,000 rpm2,000-4,200 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T66,000 rpm3,100-5,100 rpm7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
4.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
4.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.8 s
13.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
10.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.6 s
12.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
192 km/h
119 mph
191 km/h
118 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6
367 hp
274 kW
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
367 hp
274 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
470 Nm
347 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
1,676 kg
3,695 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V64.7 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T64.7 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6
825 km
513 mi
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
865 km
538 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6
367 hp
274 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
367 hp
274 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,756 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
4.7 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
4.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
367 hp
274 kW
Torque
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
1,676 kg
3,695 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,756 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
825 km
513 mi
865 km
538 mi
CO2 score
183 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 61 kg lighter
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6
Volvo S60 II Polestar 2.0 T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AMG C 43 V6
AMG C 43 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 43 V6
Polestar 2.0 T6
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsVolvoS60 II3.0 T6
AMG C 43 V6
AMG C 43
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43
Polestar 2.0 T6
R 2.5i 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsVolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
AMG C 43 V6
AMG C 43 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 43 V6
Polestar 2.0 T6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsAUDIS4 (B9)3.0 TFSI V6
AMG C 43 V6
AMG C 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 V8
Polestar 2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsVolvoS902.0 T6
AMG C 43 V6
AMG C 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8
Polestar 2.0 T6
S 3.0
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsJaguarXE (X760)S 3.0
AMG C 43 V6
AMG C 32 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6
Polestar 2.0 T6
AMG C 450 V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6 vs Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster