Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

Polestar 2.0 T6

367 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSedan2016-2018
VS

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)

AMG C 450 V6

367 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6

  • Highest torque
    520 Nm
    384 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,615 kg
    3,560 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    227 hp/t
    169 kW/t
    4.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best performance score
    74/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    367 hp
    274 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
Power
367hp274kW
367hp274kW
Torque
470Nm347lb-ft
520Nm384lb-ft
Curb weight
1,676kg3,695lb
1,615kg3,560lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
2,225kg4,905lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
45.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
46.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
13.9s
Calculated
14.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.6s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
322Nm/t215lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
865km538mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,996cc183cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,756mm187in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,839mm72in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,426mm56in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,840mm112in
Front track
1,578mm62in
1,609mm63in
Rear track
1,575mm62in
1,546mm61in
Ground clearance
124mm5in
-
Trunk volume
380L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
-
CO2 emissions-
183g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T66,000 rpm3,100-5,100 rpm7,000 rpm
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V65,500-6,000 rpm2,000-4,200 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.9 s
14.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.6 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
191 km/h
118 mph
189 km/h
118 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
367 hp
274 kW
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
367 hp
274 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
520 Nm
384 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
1,676 kg
3,695 lb
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
1,615 kg
3,560 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T64.7 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V64.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
367 hp
274 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
367 hp
274 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,756 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
4.7 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
367 hp
274 kW
Torque
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,676 kg
3,695 lb
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,756 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
Range score
865 km
538 mi
-
CO2 score
-
183 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 61 kg lighter
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II Polestar 2.0 T6
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Polestar 2.0 T6
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsVolvoS60 II3.0 T6
AMG C 450 V6
AMG C 43 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 43 V6
Polestar 2.0 T6
R 2.5i 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsVolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
AMG C 450 V6
AMG C 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 V8
Polestar 2.0 T6
AMG C 43 V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6
AMG C 450 V6
AMG C 43
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43
Polestar 2.0 T6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsAUDIS4 (B9)3.0 TFSI V6
AMG C 450 V6
AMG C 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8
Polestar 2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsVolvoS902.0 T6
AMG C 450 V6
AMG C 32 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6
Polestar 2.0 T6
S 3.0
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsJaguarXE (X760)S 3.0
AMG C 450 V6
AMG C 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 vs Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster