Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350vsVolvo S90 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S90
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight180 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions169 g/km
- Best estimated range892 km554 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299hp223kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Gross weight | 2,395kg5,280lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 61.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 18.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 180hp/t134kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 892km554mi Calculated | 789km491mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,963mm195in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | - | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 103mm4in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 169g/km | 177g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350: Power / Torque
- Volvo S90 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | - | 3,000-4,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 18.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 299 hp 223 kW |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 T6 has 11 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350 and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 5.9 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
Although Volvo S90 2.0 T6 has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 892 km 554 mi |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 789 km 491 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 299 hp 223 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T6 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | VolvoS902.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp 223 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 892 km 554 mi | 789 km 491 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 169 g/km | 177 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350 | Volvo S90 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350
- Is 270 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 102 km (64 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
- Has 11 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























