Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6vsJaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

Polestar 2.0 T6

367 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSedan2016-2018
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

S 3.0 V6

380 hp2995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    470 Nm
    347 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,676 kg
    3,695 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    219 hp/t
    163 kW/t
    4.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.5 L/100 km
    22.4 mpg US
    26.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    865 km
    538 mi
  • Best performance score
    73/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
Power
367hp274kW
380hp283kW
Torque
470Nm347lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,676kg3,695lb
1,760kg3,880lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
2,370kg5,225lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
45.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
51.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
5.3s
0-200 km/h
13.9s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
5.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.6s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
865km538mi
Calculated
860km535mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,995cc183cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,578mm62in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,575mm62in
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance
124mm5in
116mm5in
Trunk volume
380L
505L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
74L
CO2 emissions-
204g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T66,000 rpm3,100-5,100 rpm7,000 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V66,500 rpm4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
5.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
5.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.9 s
15.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.6 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
191 km/h
118 mph
184 km/h
114 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
367 hp
274 kW
JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
380 hp
283 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 has 13 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 and Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
1,676 kg
3,695 lb
JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
1,760 kg
3,880 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 and Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 and Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
216 hp/t
161 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
865 km
538 mi
JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
860 km
535 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
367 hp
274 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
380 hp
283 kW
5.3 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
Power
380 hp
283 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
Power
380 hp
283 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
4.7 s
JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
5.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
216 hp/t
161 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
380 hp
283 kW
Torque
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,676 kg
3,695 lb
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
865 km
538 mi
860 km
535 mi
CO2 score
-
204 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
216 hp/t
161 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km15.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi24.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year2,258 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 84 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 5 km (3 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Has 125 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II Polestar 2.0 T6
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 vs Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster