Volvo S40 II · Facelift 2007
Car comparison
Volvo S40 II · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5vsVolvo S40 II 2.4 i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S40 II
2.4 i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk404 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Volvo S40 II 2.4 i
- Lightest1,368 kg3,016 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range729 km453 mi
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | VolvoS40 II2.4 i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,485kg3,274lb | 1,368kg3,016lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 73.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.5s Calculated | 31.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 168Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 689km428mi Calculated | 729km453mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,435cc149cu in |
| Length | 4,476mm176in | 4,468mm176in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,531mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 404L | 404L |
| Max trunk volume | 883L | 883L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 211g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo S40 II 2.4 i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | VolvoS40 II2.4 i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.5 s | 31.1 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 170 hp 127 kW |
Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 has 60 hp more than Volvo S40 II 2.4 i.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.4 i and Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 1,368 kg 3,016 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 7.2 s |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 and Volvo S40 II 2.4 i: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.4 i and Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 689 km 428 mi |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 729 km 453 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | VolvoS40 II2.4 i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb | 1,368 kg 3,016 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 689 km 428 mi | 729 km 453 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 211 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 | Volvo S40 II 2.4 i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volvo S40 II 2.4 i
- Is 117 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 41 km (25 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























