Alfa Romeo 156 (932) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) · Facelift 2003 2.4 JTDvsVolvo S40 II 2.4 i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S40 II
2.4 i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.4 JTD
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful175 hp130 kW
- Highest torque385 Nm284 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range955 km593 mi
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score89/100
Volvo S40 II 2.4 i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Lightest1,368 kg3,016 lb
- Largest trunk404 L
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | VolvoS40 II2.4 i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 175hp130kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 385Nm284lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,385kg3,053lb | 1,368kg3,016lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 73.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.1s Calculated | 31.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 168Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 955km593mi Calculated | 729km453mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,387cc146cu in | 2,435cc149cu in |
| Length | 4,435mm175in | 4,468mm176in |
| Width | 1,743mm69in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,531mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,519mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 378L | 404L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 883L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.4 JTD: Power / Torque
- Volvo S40 II 2.4 i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | VolvoS40 II2.4 i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.1 s | 31.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | 175 hp 130 kW |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 170 hp 127 kW |
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.4 JTD has 5 hp more than Volvo S40 II 2.4 i.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.4 i and Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.4 JTD: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 1,368 kg 3,016 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | 8.3 s |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 8.2 s |
Although Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.4 JTD has more power, Volvo S40 II 2.4 i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.4 i and Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.4 JTD: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.4 JTD and Volvo S40 II 2.4 i: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | 955 km 593 mi |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 729 km 453 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | 175 hp 130 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.4 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.4 JTD | VolvoS40 II2.4 i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 175 hp 130 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | 1,368 kg 3,016 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 955 km 593 mi | 729 km 453 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 378 L 13.3 cu ft | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.4 JTD | Volvo S40 II 2.4 i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.4 JTD
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 155 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 225 km (140 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S40 II 2.4 i
- Is 17 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























