Volvo S40 II
Car comparison
Volvo S40 II 2.4 ivsHonda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Accord VII
2.4 i-VTEC 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S40 II 2.4 i
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Highest torque230 Nm170 lb-ft
- Lightest1,368 kg3,016 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range729 km453 mi
- Best economy score84/100
Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk459 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS40 II2.4 i | HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 220Nm162lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,368kg3,016lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 67.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.1s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 168Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated | 158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 729km453mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,435cc149cu in | 2,354cc144cu in |
| Length | 4,468mm176in | 4,665mm184in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,760mm69in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,531mm60in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,535mm60in | 1,510mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 404L | 459L |
| Max trunk volume | 883L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S40 II 2.4 i: Power / Torque
- Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 6,800 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS40 II2.4 i | HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.1 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 170 hp 127 kW |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 190 hp 142 kW |
Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V has 20 hp more than Volvo S40 II 2.4 i.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.4 i and Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 220 Nm 162 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 1,368 kg 3,016 lb |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 8.2 s |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V and Volvo S40 II 2.4 i: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.4 i and Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 729 km 453 mi |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.4 i | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS40 II2.4 i | HondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 220 Nm 162 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,368 kg 3,016 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 729 km 453 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II 2.4 i | Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S40 II 2.4 i
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 22 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 km (9 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Honda Accord VII 2.4 i-VTEC 16V
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























