Volkswagen Teramont X
Car comparison
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0TvsVolkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Transporter (T6)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,045 km649 mi
- Largest trunk5,800 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest2,040 kg4,497 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,111kg4,654lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,200kg7,055lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 109.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 126.7s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 63.5s Calculated | 112.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 814km506mi Calculated | 1,045km649mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,905mm193in | 4,904mm193in |
| Width | 1,989mm78in | 1,904mm75in |
| Height | 1,719mm68in | 1,990mm78in |
| Wheelbase | 2,980mm117in | 3,000mm118in |
| Ground clearance | - | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 509L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,719L | 5,800L |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,400-2,400 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 63.5 s | 112.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 138 km/h 86 mph | 132 km/h 82 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T has 16 hp more than Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 2,111 kg 4,654 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 203 km/h 126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T and Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 814 km 506 mi |
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 1,045 km 649 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.9 s | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T | VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | 2,111 kg 4,654 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 814 km 506 mi | 1,045 km 649 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 509 L 18.0 cu ft | 5,800 L 204.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T | Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 71 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 231 km (143 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5,291 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























