Volkswagen Transporter (T6)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed203 km/h126 mph
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,045 km649 mi
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score89/100
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest2,060 kg4,542 lb
- Best power-to-weight107 hp/t80 kW/t9.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,111kg4,654lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Gross weight | 3,200kg7,055lb | 2,670kg5,886lb |
| Top speed | 203 km/h 126 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 126.7s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph Calculated | 82.9s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 112.1s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,045km649mi Calculated | 745km463mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,904mm193in | 5,036mm198in |
| Width | 1,904mm75in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,990mm78in | 1,769mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 3,000mm118in | 2,979mm117in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | 203mm8in |
| Max trunk volume | 5,800L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 221g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,400-2,400 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 4,400-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 112.1 s | - |
| Top speed | 203 km/h 126 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 132 km/h 82 mph | 135 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI has 16 hp more than Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 2,111 kg 4,654 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 190 km/h 118 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 8.9 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 1,045 km 649 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 745 km 463 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.9 s | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.6 s | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTransporter (T6)2.0 TDI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 203 km/h 126 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,111 kg 4,654 lb | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,045 km 649 mi | 745 km 463 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 221 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 5,800 L 204.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI | Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Transporter (T6) 2.0 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 300 km (186 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 51 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























