Car comparison

Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Teramont X 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010

2.0 TSI

210 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2010-2015
VS

Volkswagen Teramont X

2.0T

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    238 km/h
    148 mph
  • Lightest
    1,563 kg
    3,446 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    134 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.6 L/100 km
    24.5 mpg US
    29.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T

  • Most powerful
    220 hp
    164 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    814 km
    506 mi
  • Largest trunk
    509 L
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best practicality score
    72/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIVolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
Power
210hp157kW
220hp164kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,563kg3,446lb
2,040kg4,497lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
-
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
101.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
108.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
33.5s
Calculated
63.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton
Calculated
172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
775km481mi
Calculated
814km506mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,423mm174in
4,905mm193in
Width
1,791mm71in
1,989mm78in
Height
1,444mm57in
1,719mm68in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,980mm117in
Front track
1,545mm61in
-
Rear track
1,547mm61in
-
Trunk volume
205L
509L
Max trunk volume-
1,719L
Doors
2
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
55L
70L
CO2 emissions
165g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Teramont X 2.0TPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI5,300-6,200 rpm1,700-5,200 rpm6,450 rpm
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T4,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIVolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.5 s
63.1 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
220 hp
164 kW

Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
1,563 kg
3,446 lb
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
2,040 kg
4,497 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
238 km/h
148 mph
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI7.8 s
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T8.3 s

Although Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T has more power, Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
775 km
481 mi
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
814 km
506 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
7.8 s
238 km/h
148 mph
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
220 hp
164 kW
8.3 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,423 mm
174.1 in
Height
1,444 mm
56.9 in
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
509 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,905 mm
193.1 in
Height
1,719 mm
67.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
7.8 s
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIVolkswagenTeramont X2.0T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
220 hp
164 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.3 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,563 kg
3,446 lb
2,040 kg
4,497 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,423 mm
174.1 in
Height
1,444 mm
56.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
509 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,905 mm
193.1 in
Height
1,719 mm
67.7 in
Range score
775 km
481 mi
814 km
506 mi
CO2 score
165 g/km
-
Trunk score
205 L
7.2 cu ft
509 L
18.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km15.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi24.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year2,258 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI

  • Is 477 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 28 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 304 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsVolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
2.0T
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0TvsVolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023380TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
2.0T
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0TvsVolkswagenTayron X380TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TDI V6
2.0T
GTS 250 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0TvsVolkswagenNivusFacelift 2024GTS 250 TSI
2.0 TSI
E 250 CDI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0TvsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
1.6 THP
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsPeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
2.0T
GLC 200
VS
VolkswagenTeramont X2.0TvsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019GLC 200
2.0 TSI
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Teramont X 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster