Car comparison

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6vsVolkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Eos

3.2 V6

250 hp3168 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2006-2009
VS

Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010

2.0 TSI

210 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2010-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    247 km/h
    153 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    330 Nm
    243 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,539 kg
    3,393 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    162 hp/t
    121 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    205 L
  • Best overall score
    51/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best practicality score
    44/100

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    733 km
    456 mi
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenEos3.2 V6VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
250hp186kW
210hp157kW
Torque
330Nm243lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,539kg3,393lb
1,586kg3,497lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
2,020kg4,453lb
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
97.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
100.3s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
29.0s
Calculated
34.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
598km371mi
Calculated
733km456mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,168cc193cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,407mm174in
4,423mm174in
Width
1,791mm71in
1,791mm71in
Height
1,443mm57in
1,444mm57in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,553mm61in
1,547mm61in
Trunk volume
205L
205L
Max trunk volume
380L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
55L
CO2 emissions-
174g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenEos3.2 V66,250 rpm2,750 rpm6,500 rpm
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI5,300-6,200 rpm1,700-5,200 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenEos3.2 V6VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.0 s
34.1 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 has 40 hp more than Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
1,586 kg
3,497 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
247 km/h
153 mph
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
236 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V67.3 s
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 and Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
598 km
371 mi
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
733 km
456 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
7.3 s
247 km/h
153 mph
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
7.8 s
236 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,423 mm
174.1 in
Height
1,444 mm
56.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
7.3 s
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenEos3.2 V6VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
250 hp
186 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.8 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
1,586 kg
3,497 lb
Fuel consumption
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,423 mm
174.1 in
Height
1,444 mm
56.9 in
Range score
598 km
371 mi
733 km
456 mi
CO2 score
-
174 g/km
Trunk score
205 L
7.2 cu ft
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
Consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.10 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.91 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,415 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 47 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI

  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 136 km (84 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsVolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
3.2 V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI
3.2 V6
3.2i V6 24V
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TDI V6
3.2 V6
2.7
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsPorscheCayman (987C)2.7
2.0 TSI
E 250 CDI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
3.2 V6
1.3 Wankel
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
2.0 TSI
1.6 THP
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsPeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
3.2 V6
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsRenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 vs Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster