Car comparison

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Scirocco III

2.0 TSI

210 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2009-2014
VS

Volkswagen Eos

2.0 16V TFSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    238 km/h
    148 mph
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,318 kg
    2,906 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    159 hp/t
    119 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.0 L/100 km
    23.5 mpg US
    28.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    733 km
    456 mi
  • Largest trunk
    312 L
  • Best overall score
    53/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIVolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Power
210hp157kW
200hp149kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,318kg2,906lb
1,539kg3,393lb
Gross weight
1,760kg3,880lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
83.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
98.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
28.5s
Calculated
35.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
733km456mi
Calculated
671km417mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,256mm168in
4,407mm174in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,791mm71in
Height
1,404mm55in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,569mm62in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,575mm62in
1,553mm61in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
-
Trunk volume
312L
205L
Max trunk volume
1,006L
380L
Doors
3
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI5,300-6,200 rpm1,700-5,200 rpm6,450 rpm
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI5,100 rpm1,800 rpm5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIVolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.5 s
35.6 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
200 hp
149 kW

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI and Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
1,318 kg
2,906 lb
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
1,539 kg
3,393 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
238 km/h
148 mph
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
232 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI6.9 s
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
733 km
456 mi
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
671 km
417 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
6.9 s
238 km/h
148 mph
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.8 s
232 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
312 L
11.0 cu ft
Length
4,256 mm
167.6 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.9 s
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIVolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,318 kg
2,906 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
312 L
11.0 cu ft
Length
4,256 mm
167.6 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
733 km
456 mi
671 km
417 mi
Trunk score
312 L
11.0 cu ft
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
159 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 221 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 107 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
GTS 2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014GTS 2.0 TSI
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
2.0 16V TFSI
1.8 TBi
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsAlfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi
2.0 TSI
1.6 THP
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsPeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.5 T5 20V
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsVolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 TSI
125i
VS
VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSIvsBMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i
2.0 16V TFSI
1.3 Wankel
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster