Alfa Romeo Brera
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBivsVolkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Eos
2.0 16V TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range864 km537 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
- Lowest city consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,539kg3,393lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 98.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.2s Calculated | 35.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 864km537mi Calculated | 671km417mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,742cc106cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,410mm174in | 4,407mm174in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,791mm71in |
| Height | 1,341mm53in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,528mm100in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,553mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 205L |
| Max trunk volume | 610L | 380L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 189g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 5,000 rpm | 1,400 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.2 s | 35.6 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 864 km 537 mi |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 671 km 417 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 864 km 537 mi | 671 km 417 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 189 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi | Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 109 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 193 km (120 mi) more estimated range
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























