Volkswagen Eos
Car comparison
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSIvsAlfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Brera
1.8 TBi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best estimated range864 km537 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,497kg3,300lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.8s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 94.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.9s Calculated | 33.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 764km475mi Calculated | 864km537mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,742cc106cu in |
| Length | 4,407mm174in | 4,410mm174in |
| Width | 1,791mm71in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,341mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,528mm100in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 106mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 205L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 380L | 610L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 5,000 rpm | 1,400 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.9 s | 33.2 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 7.7 s |
Although Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI has more power, Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 764 km 475 mi |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 864 km 537 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 764 km 475 mi | 864 km 537 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI | Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 67 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























