Renault Laguna Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurbovsAlfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Brera
1.8 TBi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful205 hp153 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk423 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range864 km537 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 205hp153kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,503kg3,314lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 1,923kg4,239lb | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 94.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.7s Calculated | 33.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 825km513mi Calculated | 864km537mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,742cc106cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,410mm174in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,400mm55in | 1,341mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,528mm100in |
| Front track | - | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 423L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 610L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 5,000 rpm | 1,400 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.7 s | 33.3 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 205 hp 153 kW |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 200 hp 149 kW |
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo has 5 hp more than Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 7.8 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 7.7 s |
Although Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo has more power, Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 825 km 513 mi |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 864 km 537 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 205 hp 153 kW | 7.8 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | Alfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 205 hp 153 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 825 km 513 mi | 864 km 537 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo | Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 123 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Brera 1.8 TBi
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 73 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























