Renault Laguna Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurbovsVolkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Eos
2.0 16V TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful205 hp153 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,503 kg3,314 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range825 km513 mi
- Largest trunk423 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 205hp153kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,503kg3,314lb | 1,539kg3,393lb |
| Gross weight | 1,923kg4,239lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 99.6s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.7s Calculated | 35.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 825km513mi Calculated | 671km417mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,407mm174in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,791mm71in |
| Height | 1,400mm55in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | - | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,553mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 423L | 205L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 380L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.7 s | 35.8 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 205 hp 153 kW |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo has 5 hp more than Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 7.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 825 km 513 mi |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 671 km 417 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 205 hp 153 kW | 7.8 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 205 hp 153 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 825 km 513 mi | 671 km 417 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo | Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 36 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 154 km (96 mi) more estimated range
- Has 218 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























