Volkswagen Eos
Car comparison
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSIvsToyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Celica (T23)
1.8 i GT- R
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Lightest1,190 kg2,624 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk365 L
- Best overall score48/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 182hp136kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 181Nm133lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,539kg3,393lb | 1,190kg2,624lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | - |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 99.6s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 80.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.8s Calculated | 34.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 671km417mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,407mm174in | 4,328mm170in |
| Width | 1,791mm71in | 1,735mm68in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,488mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,478mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 205L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | 380L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: Power / Torque
- Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 7,600 rpm | 6,800 rpm | 7,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.8 s | 34.2 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 182 hp 136 kW |
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI has 18 hp more than Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 7.8 s |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 7.5 s |
Although Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI has more power, Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 182 hp 136 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 182 hp 136 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 671 km 417 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 99 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
- Is 349 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 160 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























