AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000
Car comparison
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000 1.8 TvsToyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Celica (T23)
1.8 i GT- R
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
- Lightest1,190 kg2,624 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk365 L
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 182hp136kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 181Nm133lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 1,190kg2,624lb |
| Gross weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | - |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 88.2s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 80.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 34.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 188Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 679km422mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,781cc109cu in | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,041mm159in | 4,328mm170in |
| Width | 1,764mm69in | 1,735mm68in |
| Height | 1,346mm53in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,422mm95in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,528mm60in | 1,488mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,478mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 270L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | 540L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 194g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T: Power / Torque
- Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 5,700 rpm | 1,980-5,400 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 7,600 rpm | 6,800 rpm | 7,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 34.2 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 190 hp 142 kW |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 182 hp 136 kW |
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T has 8 hp more than Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R and AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 7.4 s |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T and Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 182 hp 136 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 182 hp 136 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 679 km 422 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 194 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 59 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























