Car comparison

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6vsToyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II)

3.0 V6

207 hp2946 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2005
VS

Toyota Celica (T23)

1.8 i GT- R

182 hp1796 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe1999-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    207 hp
    154 kW
  • Highest torque
    285 Nm
    210 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    390 L
  • Best overall score
    51/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    80/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Lightest
    1,190 kg
    2,624 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    153 hp/t
    114 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPeugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R
Power
207hp154kW
182hp136kW
Torque
285Nm210lb-ft
181Nm133lb-ft
Curb weight
1,485kg3,274lb
1,190kg2,624lb
Gross weight
1,910kg4,211lb
-
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
99.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
80.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
32.4s
Calculated
34.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
700km435mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
2,946cc180cu in
1,796cc110cu in
Length
4,615mm182in
4,328mm170in
Width
1,780mm70in
1,735mm68in
Height
1,352mm53in
1,305mm51in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,600mm102in
Front track
1,511mm59in
1,488mm59in
Rear track
1,525mm60in
1,478mm58in
Trunk volume
390L
365L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
70L
55L
CO2 emissions
238g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- RPowerTorque
  • Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V66,000 rpm3,750 rpm6,250 rpm
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R7,600 rpm6,800 rpm7,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPeugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.4 s
34.2 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
207 hp
154 kW
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R
182 hp
136 kW

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 has 25 hp more than Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R.

The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R and Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
285 Nm
210 lb-ft
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R
181 Nm
133 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
1,485 kg
3,274 lb
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R
1,190 kg
2,624 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
240 km/h
149 mph
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V67.8 s
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R7.5 s

Although Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 has more power, Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R and Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
207 hp
154 kW
7.8 s
240 km/h
149 mph
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R
182 hp
136 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
Power
207 hp
154 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,615 mm
181.7 in
Height
1,352 mm
53.2 in
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
365 L
12.9 cu ft
Length
4,328 mm
170.4 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePeugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R
Power
207 hp
154 kW
182 hp
136 kW
Torque
285 Nm
210 lb-ft
181 Nm
133 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.5 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,485 kg
3,274 lb
1,190 kg
2,624 lb
Fuel consumption
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,615 mm
181.7 in
Height
1,352 mm
53.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
365 L
12.9 cu ft
Length
4,328 mm
170.4 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
Range score
700 km
435 mi
-
CO2 score
238 g/km
-
Trunk score
390 L
13.8 cu ft
365 L
12.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePeugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
Consumption10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.16 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,625 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Has 104 Nm more
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 25 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R

  • Is 295 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsPeugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6
1.8 i GT- R
2.0 Turbo
VS
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- RvsToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
3.0 V6
330Cd
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsBMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd
1.8 i GT- R
1.8 T
VS
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- RvsAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
3.0 V6
1.6 THP
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsPeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
1.8 i GT- R
3.0 V6
VS
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- RvsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
3.0 V6
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsRenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
1.8 i GT- R
1.3 Wankel
VS
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- RvsMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
1.8 i GT- R
328Ci
VS
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- RvsBMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci
1.8 i GT- R
2.5 20V T
VS
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- RvsVolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T
3.0 V6
2.0 16V TFSI
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsVolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
1.8 i GT- R
2.0 i 16V Type S
VS
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- RvsAcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S
Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 vs Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R - car comparison - FastVsFaster