Volvo C70 Coupe
Car comparison
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V TvsToyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Celica (T23)
1.8 i GT- R
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Largest trunk427 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Lightest1,190 kg2,624 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 182hp136kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 181Nm133lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,190kg2,624lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 99.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 80.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.5s Calculated | 34.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 654km407mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,435cc149cu in | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,328mm170in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,735mm68in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,488mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,478mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 427L | 365L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T: Power / Torque
- Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 7,600 rpm | 6,800 rpm | 7,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.5 s | 34.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 92 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 193 hp 144 kW |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 182 hp 136 kW |
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T has 11 hp more than Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 7.8 s |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 7.5 s |
Although Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T has more power, Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 182 hp 136 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 182 hp 136 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 654 km 407 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 89 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























