BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 328CivsVolvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C70 Coupe
2.5 20V T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 328Ci
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score57/100
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci | VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,395kg3,075lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 98.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.6s Calculated | 32.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 654km407mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,798cc171cu in | 2,435cc149cu in |
| Length | 4,488mm177in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,757mm69in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,369mm54in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 427L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 328Ci: Power / Torque
- Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci | 5,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci | VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.6 s | 32.4 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci | 193 hp 144 kW |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 193 hp 144 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci | 7.0 s |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 328Ci and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.0 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci | VolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 654 km 407 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) 328Ci
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 13 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.5 20V T
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























