Car comparison

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6vsVolkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II)

3.0 V6

207 hp2946 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2005
VS

Volkswagen Eos

2.0 16V TFSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    207 hp
    154 kW
  • Highest torque
    285 Nm
    210 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,485 kg
    3,274 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    139 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    700 km
    435 mi
  • Largest trunk
    390 L
  • Best overall score
    51/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPeugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Power
207hp154kW
200hp149kW
Torque
285Nm210lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,485kg3,274lb
1,539kg3,393lb
Gross weight
1,910kg4,211lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
98.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
98.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
32.2s
Calculated
35.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
700km435mi
Calculated
671km417mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,946cc180cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,615mm182in
4,407mm174in
Width
1,780mm70in
1,791mm71in
Height
1,352mm53in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,511mm59in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,525mm60in
1,553mm61in
Trunk volume
390L
205L
Max trunk volume-
380L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
70L
55L
CO2 emissions
238g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSIPowerTorque
  • Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V66,000 rpm3,750 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI5,100 rpm1,800 rpm5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPeugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.2 s
35.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
207 hp
154 kW
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
200 hp
149 kW

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 has 7 hp more than Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI and Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
285 Nm
210 lb-ft
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
1,485 kg
3,274 lb
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
1,539 kg
3,393 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
240 km/h
149 mph
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
232 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V67.8 s
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI7.8 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI and Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
700 km
435 mi
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
671 km
417 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
207 hp
154 kW
7.8 s
240 km/h
149 mph
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.8 s
232 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
Power
207 hp
154 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,615 mm
181.7 in
Height
1,352 mm
53.2 in
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
Power
207 hp
154 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.8 s
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePeugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
Power
207 hp
154 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
285 Nm
210 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,485 kg
3,274 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Fuel consumption
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,615 mm
181.7 in
Height
1,352 mm
53.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
700 km
435 mi
671 km
417 mi
CO2 score
238 g/km
-
Trunk score
390 L
13.8 cu ft
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePeugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
Consumption10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.50 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.16 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,625 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Is 54 kg lighter
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 185 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI

  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsPeugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
3.0 V6
330Cd
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsBMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
3.0 V6
1.6 THP
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsPeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
2.0 16V TFSI
1.8 TBi
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsAlfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi
3.0 V6
1.8 T
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI
3.0 V6
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsRenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
Peugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6vsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
VolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSIvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Peugeot 406 Coupe (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 vs Volkswagen Eos 2.0 16V TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster