Toyota Celica (T23)
Car comparison
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- RvsAcura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura RSX
2.0 i 16V Type S
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Most powerful212 hp158 kW
- Highest torque194 Nm143 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk504 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,190 kg2,624 lb
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score0/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 182hp136kW | 212hp158kW |
| Torque | 181Nm133lb-ft | 194Nm143lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,190kg2,624lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 64.8s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.2s Calculated | 31.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated | 148Nm/t99lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,796cc110cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,328mm170in | 4,374mm172in |
| Width | 1,735mm68in | 1,725mm68in |
| Height | 1,305mm51in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,570mm101in |
| Front track | 1,488mm59in | 1,486mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,486mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 365L | 504L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R: Power / Torque
- Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 7,600 rpm | 6,800 rpm | 7,850 rpm |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 7,800 rpm | 7,000 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.2 s | 31.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 182 hp 136 kW |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 212 hp 158 kW |
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S has 30 hp more than Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R and Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 194 Nm 143 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 7.5 s |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S and Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R: 1.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 182 hp 136 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 212 hp 158 kW | 6.2 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 182 hp 136 kW | 212 hp 158 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft | 194 Nm 143 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | 504 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 13 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 139 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























