Renault Megane II Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsAcura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura RSX
2.0 i 16V Type S
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful224 hp167 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk504 L
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 212hp158kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 194Nm143lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,355kg2,987lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | - |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 64.8s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 31.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 148Nm/t99lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,228mm166in | 4,374mm172in |
| Width | - | 1,725mm68in |
| Height | 1,436mm57in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,617mm103in | 2,570mm101in |
| Front track | 1,517mm60in | 1,486mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,521mm60in | 1,486mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 504L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,190L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 209g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
- Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 7,800 rpm | 7,000 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 31.8 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 212 hp 158 kW |
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V has 12 hp more than Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S.
The biggest power difference is between Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S and Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 194 Nm 143 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 6.5 s |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 6.2 s |
Although Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V has more power, Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S and Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 212 hp 158 kW | 6.2 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 212 hp 158 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 194 Nm 143 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 209 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 504 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 106 Nm more
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 174 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























