BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) · Facelift 2003 330CivsAcura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAcura RSX
2.0 i 16V Type S
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Ci
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk504 L
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 212hp158kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 194Nm143lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Gross weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 64.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.7s Calculated | 31.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 148Nm/t99lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 692km430mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,488mm177in | 4,374mm172in |
| Width | 1,757mm69in | 1,725mm68in |
| Height | 1,369mm54in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,570mm101in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,486mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,486mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 504L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Ci: Power / Torque
- Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 7,800 rpm | 7,000 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.7 s | 31.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 231 hp 172 kW |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 212 hp 158 kW |
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Ci has 19 hp more than Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S.
The biggest power difference is between Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S and BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Ci: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 194 Nm 143 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 6.5 s |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 6.2 s |
Although BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Ci has more power, Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S and BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Ci: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 162 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | 212 hp 158 kW | 6.2 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | AcuraRSX2.0 i 16V Type S | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 212 hp 158 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 194 Nm 143 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 692 km 430 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 504 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Ci |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Ci
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 106 Nm more
- Has 42 km/h (26 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Acura RSX 2.0 i 16V Type S
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 94 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























