Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

GT TSI380

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 D5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Lightest
    1,715 kg
    3,781 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    463 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5

  • Most powerful
    235 hp
    175 kW
  • Highest torque
    480 Nm
    354 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,145 km
    712 mi
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Power
220hp164kW
235hp175kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
480Nm354lb-ft
Curb weight
1,715kg3,781lb
2,205kg4,861lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
83.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
98.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
38.4s
Calculated
43.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
775km482mi
Calculated
1,145km712mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,634mm182in
4,950mm195in
Width
1,883mm74in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,776mm70in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,984mm117in
Front track-
1,673mm66in
Rear track-
1,675mm66in
Ground clearance-
238mm9in
Trunk volume
463L
314L
Max trunk volume
1,607L
1,886L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
62L
71L
CO2 emissions-
162g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5PowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3804,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D54,000 rpm1,740-2,220 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.4 s
43.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 hp
164 kW
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 has 15 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2,205 kg
4,861 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 km/h
137 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3807.5 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D57.8 s

Although Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 has more power, Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
775 km
482 mi
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
1,145 km
712 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 hp
164 kW
7.5 s
220 km/h
137 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
7.8 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.5 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Power
220 hp
164 kW
235 hp
175 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
2,205 kg
4,861 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Range score
775 km
482 mi
1,145 km
712 mi
CO2 score
-
162 g/km
Trunk score
463 L
16.4 cu ft
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380

  • Is 490 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 149 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 370 km (230 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GT TSI380
380TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
2.0 D5
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
GT TSI380
45 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
GT TSI380
25d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsJaguarF-Pace25d
2.0 D5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 D5
2.0 D240
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
GT TSI380
45 TDI V6
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
2.0 D5
300
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
GT TSI380
2.2 JTDM
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
GT TSI380
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
GT TSI380
20i
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsBMWX2 (F39)20i
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 vs Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster