Car comparison

BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X2 (F39)

20i

192 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

GT TSI380

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Most powerful
    220 hp
    164 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

BMW X2 (F39) 20i

  • Fastest top speed
    224 km/h
    139 mph
  • Lightest
    1,540 kg
    3,395 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    910 km
    566 mi
  • Largest trunk
    470 L
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX2 (F39)20iSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
192hp143kW
220hp164kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,715kg3,781lb
Gross weight
2,145kg4,729lb
-
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
78.6s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
83.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
34.8s
Calculated
38.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
910km566mi
Calculated
775km482mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,360mm172in
4,634mm182in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,883mm74in
Height
1,526mm60in
1,649mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,791mm110in
Front track
1,563mm62in
-
Rear track
1,562mm61in
-
Ground clearance
182mm7in
-
Trunk volume
470L
463L
Max trunk volume
1,355L
1,607L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
62L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X2 (F39) 20iSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380PowerTorque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX2 (F39)20i5,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3804,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX2 (F39)20iSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.8 s
38.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
192 hp
143 kW
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 hp
164 kW

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 has 28 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 20i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: 28 hp (21 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
1,715 kg
3,781 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
224 km/h
139 mph
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i7.8 s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3807.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
910 km
566 mi
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
775 km
482 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX2 (F39)20i
192 hp
143 kW
7.8 s
224 km/h
139 mph
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 hp
164 kW
7.5 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX2 (F39)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX2 (F39)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

BMW X2 (F39) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX2 (F39)20i
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
7.8 s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX2 (F39)20i
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX2 (F39)20iSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
192 hp
143 kW
220 hp
164 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.5 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
Fuel consumption
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Range score
910 km
566 mi
775 km
482 mi
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X2 (F39) 20iSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380
Consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.73 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.87 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,759 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 20i

  • Is 175 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 135 km (84 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 7 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380

  • Has 28 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 20i vs Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 - car comparison - FastVsFaster