BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I
GT TSI380
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score83/100
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range910 km566 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20i | SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,715kg3,781lb |
| Gross weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | - |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.6s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 83.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.8s Calculated | 38.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 910km566mi Calculated | 775km482mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,634mm182in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,883mm74in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,649mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 463L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,607L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20i | SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.8 s | 38.4 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 has 28 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 20i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 7.8 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 910 km 566 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 | 775 km 482 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.8 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.5 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20i | SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 910 km 566 mi | 775 km 482 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 463 L 16.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20i | Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 135 km (84 mi) more estimated range
- Has 7 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























