Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240vsSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 D240

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

GT TSI380

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    224 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    898 km
    558 mi
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
240hp179kW
220hp164kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,926kg4,246lb
1,715kg3,781lb
Gross weight
2,420kg5,335lb
-
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
89.9s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
83.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
37.3s
Calculated
38.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
898km558mi
Calculated
775km482mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,634mm182in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,883mm74in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,649mm65in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,791mm110in
Front track
1,635mm64in
-
Rear track
1,634mm64in
-
Ground clearance
204mm8in
-
Trunk volume
1,234L
463L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
1,607L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
56L
62L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380PowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D2404,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3804,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.3 s
38.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
240 hp
179 kW
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 hp
164 kW

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 has 20 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
1,926 kg
4,246 lb
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
1,715 kg
3,781 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
224 km/h
139 mph
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D2407.4 s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3807.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
898 km
558 mi
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
775 km
482 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
240 hp
179 kW
7.4 s
224 km/h
139 mph
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 hp
164 kW
7.5 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.4 s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
240 hp
179 kW
220 hp
164 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.5 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,926 kg
4,246 lb
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Range score
898 km
558 mi
775 km
482 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
-
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 123 km (77 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 771 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380

  • Is 211 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D240
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
GT TSI380
380TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
2.0 D240
25d
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsJaguarF-Pace25d
GT TSI380
45 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
2.0 D240
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 D240
300
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
GT TSI380
2.0 B5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
GT TSI380
45 TDI V6
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
2.0 D240
2.0
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
GT TSI380
2.2 JTDM
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
2.0 D240
2.0 D5
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
GT TSI380
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 vs Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 - car comparison - FastVsFaster