Seat Tarraco
Car comparison
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 B4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed211 km/h131 mph
- Lightest1,698 kg3,743 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t83 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk760 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Most powerful197 hp147 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,203 km748 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,698kg3,743lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Gross weight | 2,380kg5,247lb | - |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.5s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 86.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 48.8s Calculated | 66.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 822km511mi Calculated | 1,203km748mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,735mm186in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,674mm66in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,790mm110in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,574mm62in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 192mm8in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 760L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,760 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 48.8 s | 66.5 s |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 has 7 hp more than Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 1,698 kg 3,743 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 8.0 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 8.3 s |
Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 has more power, Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 822 km 511 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,203 km 748 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW | 8.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,698 kg 3,743 lb | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 822 km 511 mi | 1,203 km 748 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 760 L 26.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
- Is 252 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 255 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 381 km (237 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























