Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4vsRenault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 D4

190 hp2400 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Renault Talisman

2.0 Blue dCi

200 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi

  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Lightest
    1,645 kg
    3,627 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    122 hp/t
    91 kW/t
    8.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    608 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    79/100

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    1,250 km
    777 mi
  • Best performance score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
Power
190hp142kW
200hp149kW
Torque
420Nm310lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,671kg3,684lb
1,645kg3,627lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
2,197kg4,844lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
87.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
85.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
31.8s
Calculated
31.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.4s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton
Calculated
243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,250km777mi
Calculated
959km596mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,400cc146cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,849mm191in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,868mm74in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,463mm58in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,809mm111in
Front track
1,588mm63in
-
Rear track
1,585mm62in
-
Ground clearance
124mm5in
145mm6in
Trunk volume
380L
608L
Max trunk volume-
1,022L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
47L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.4 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.8 s
31.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
3.0 s
330 ft
101 m
7.4 s
7.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.9 s
11.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
200 hp
149 kW

Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi has 10 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,671 kg
3,684 lb
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
1,645 kg
3,627 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D48.8 s
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi8.9 s

Although Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,250 km
777 mi
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
959 km
596 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.8 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
200 hp
149 kW
8.9 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
608 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,849 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,463 mm
57.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
8.8 s
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
Power
190 hp
142 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,671 kg
3,684 lb
1,645 kg
3,627 lb
Fuel consumption
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
608 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,849 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,463 mm
57.6 in
Range score
1,250 km
777 mi
959 km
596 mi
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
608 L
21.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi
Consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.45 LC100 km8.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.21 LC100 mi13.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used810 L214 US gal178 UK gal735 L194 US gal162 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,418 LC/year1,286 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 291 km (181 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 26 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 228 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D4
Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.0 Blue dCi
2.0 Blue dCi
VS
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCivsRenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi
2.0 D4
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0 Blue dCi
2.0 Blue dCi
VS
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCivsRenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi
2.0 D4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS902.0 D4
2.0 Blue dCi
2.0 Blue dCi
VS
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCivsRenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0 Blue dCi
E 200
VS
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCivsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
2.0 Blue dCi
2.0 TDI
VS
RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCivsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
2.0 D4
1.5 EcoBoost
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsFordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 vs Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster