Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4vsFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014
1.5 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Lightest1,358 kg2,994 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 182hp136kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,671kg3,684lb | 1,358kg2,994lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 35.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,250km777mi Calculated | 982km610mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 1,499cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,534mm179in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,823mm72in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,648mm104in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,544mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,559mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 372L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 128g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 35.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 has 8 hp more than Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 1,671 kg 3,684 lb |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 1,358 kg 2,994 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 8.8 s |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 8.7 s |
Although Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 has more power, Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 1,250 km 777 mi |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 982 km 610 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW | 8.7 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 182 hp 136 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,671 kg 3,684 lb | 1,358 kg 2,994 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,250 km 777 mi | 982 km 610 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 128 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 372 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 | Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 268 km (166 mi) more estimated range
- Has 8 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
- Is 313 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























