Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4vsVolkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Passat (B8)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Lightest1,614 kg3,558 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,320 km820 mi
- Largest trunk586 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,671kg3,684lb | 1,614kg3,558lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,220kg4,894lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 68.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 28.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,250km777mi Calculated | 1,320km820mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,767mm188in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,456mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,568mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 586L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,152L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 132g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 28.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 1,671 kg 3,684 lb |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 8.8 s |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TDI and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 1,250 km 777 mi |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI | 1,320 km 820 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,671 kg 3,684 lb | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,250 km 777 mi | 1,320 km 820 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 132 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 586 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 | Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TDI
- Is 57 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 km (43 mi) more estimated range
- Has 206 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























