Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4vsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 D4

190 hp2400 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0d

180 hp1999 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.1 s
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,595 kg
    3,516 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.8 L/100 km
    61.9 mpg US
    74.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,535 km
    954 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    114 hp/t
    85 kW/t
    8.8 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
190hp142kW
180hp134kW
Torque
420Nm310lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,671kg3,684lb
1,595kg3,516lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
229 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
87.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
74.6s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
31.8s
Calculated
31.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.4s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton
Calculated
270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,250km777mi
Calculated
1,535km954mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,400cc146cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance
124mm5in
116mm5in
Trunk volume
380L
505L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
66L
CO2 emissions-
114g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D44,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm5,200 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.4 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.8 s
31.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
229 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.4 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.9 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,671 kg
3,684 lb
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,595 kg
3,516 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
229 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D48.8 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d8.1 s

Although Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 has more power, Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,250 km
777 mi
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,535 km
954 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.8 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
8.1 s
229 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
8.8 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
1,671 kg
3,684 lb
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
Fuel consumption
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
1,250 km
777 mi
1,535 km
954 mi
CO2 score
-
114 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.45 LC100 km7.52 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.21 LC100 mi12.11 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used810 L214 US gal178 UK gal645 L170 US gal142 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,418 LC/year1,129 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 76 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 285 km (177 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 125 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D4
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0 D4
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.0 D4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS902.0 D4
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
2.0 D4
1.5 EcoBoost
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsFordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 vs Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster