Jaguar XF (X250)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8vsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful385 hp287 kW
- Highest torque515 Nm380 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight216 hp/t161 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions114 g/km
- Best estimated range1,535 km954 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385hp287kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 515Nm380lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | 1,595kg3,516lb |
| Gross weight | 2,285kg5,038lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 56.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.1s Calculated | 31.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 631km392mi Calculated | 1,535km954mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,961mm195in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,877mm74in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,909mm115in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 923L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 264g/km | 114g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.1 s | 31.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 385 hp 287 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8 has 205 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8: 205 hp (153 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 515 Nm 380 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 5.7 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 2.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8: 6.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 631 km 392 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,535 km 954 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 385 hp 287 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.1 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp 287 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 515 Nm 380 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 631 km 392 mi | 1,535 km 954 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 264 g/km | 114 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8 | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8
- Has 205 hp more
- Has 85 Nm more
- Is 2.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 36 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Has 103 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Is 185 kg lighter
- Uses 6.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 904 km (562 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
- Emits 150 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























