Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,535 km954 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Lightest1,565 kg3,450 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions111 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,565kg3,450lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,235kg4,927lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.6s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 68.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.7s Calculated | 31.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,535km954mi Calculated | 1,333km828mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 114g/km | 111g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.7 s | 31.5 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 8.1 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,535 km 954 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,333 km 828 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.1 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.8 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,535 km 954 mi | 1,333 km 828 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 114 g/km | 111 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 202 km (125 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























