Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200vsRenault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Talisman
2.0 Blue dCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range959 km596 mi
- Largest trunk608 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Lightest1,629 kg3,591 lb
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197hp147kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,629kg3,591lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Gross weight | 2,364kg5,212lb | 2,197kg4,844lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 85.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.8s Calculated | 31.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 959km596mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,849mm191in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,868mm74in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,463mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,809mm111in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 608L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,022L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 47L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.8 s | 31.6 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 3.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 11.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 197 hp 147 kW |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 200 hp 149 kW |
Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi has 3 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 and Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 1,629 kg 3,591 lb |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 7.5 s |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 8.9 s |
Although Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 and Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 769 km 478 mi |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 959 km 596 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 197 hp 147 kW | 7.5 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp 147 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,629 kg 3,591 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 959 km 596 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 608 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 | Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
- Is 16 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 190 km (118 mi) more estimated range
- Has 68 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























