Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 D4vsRenault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Talisman
2.0 Blue dCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S90 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,170 km727 mi
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score94/100
Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,645 kg3,627 lb
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk608 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 D4 | RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,866kg4,114lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,197kg4,844lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 81.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 85.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.6s Calculated | 31.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,170km727mi Calculated | 959km596mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,849mm191in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,868mm74in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,463mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,809mm111in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 608L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,022L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 123g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 D4 | RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.6 s | 31.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 3.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 11.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 200 hp 149 kW |
Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi has 10 hp more than Volvo S90 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D4 and Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 1,866 kg 4,114 lb |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 8.2 s |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 8.9 s |
Although Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi has more power, Volvo S90 2.0 D4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D4 and Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 1,170 km 727 mi |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 959 km 596 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S90 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 D4 | RenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,866 kg 4,114 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,170 km 727 mi | 959 km 596 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 123 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 608 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 D4 | Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 D4
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 211 km (131 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Talisman 2.0 Blue dCi
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 221 kg lighter
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 108 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























