Car comparison

Volvo S90 2.0 D4vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 200

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S90

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2018-2020
VS

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018

C 200

184 hp1497 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S90 2.0 D4

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    123 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,170 km
    727 mi
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS902.0 D4Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
Power
190hp142kW
184hp137kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,866kg4,114lb
1,520kg3,351lb
Gross weight-
2,175kg4,795lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
81.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
73.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
29.6s
Calculated
29.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.9s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,170km727mi
Calculated
594km369mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,497cc91cu in
Length
4,963mm195in
4,686mm184in
Width
1,879mm74in
1,810mm71in
Height
1,443mm57in
1,442mm57in
Wheelbase
2,941mm116in
2,840mm112in
Front track
1,628mm64in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,629mm64in
-
Ground clearance
152mm6in
92mm4in
Trunk volume
500L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
41L
CO2 emissions
123g/km
156g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S90 2.0 D4Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200PowerTorque
  • Volvo S90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS902.0 D44,250 rpm-5,000 rpm
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200-1,200-4,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS902.0 D4Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.6 s
29.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.9 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.9 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
184 hp
137 kW

Volvo S90 2.0 D4 has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200 and Volvo S90 2.0 D4: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D4
1,866 kg
4,114 lb
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
1,520 kg
3,351 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D4
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D48.2 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 2008.1 s

Although Volvo S90 2.0 D4 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200 and Volvo S90 2.0 D4: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D4
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D4 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D4
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D4
1,170 km
727 mi
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
594 km
369 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS902.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.2 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
184 hp
137 kW
8.1 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS902.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS902.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Volvo S90 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS902.0 D4
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
8.2 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS902.0 D4
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS902.0 D4Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
Power
190 hp
142 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,866 kg
4,114 lb
1,520 kg
3,351 lb
Fuel consumption
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in
Range score
1,170 km
727 mi
594 km
369 mi
CO2 score
123 g/km
156 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S90 2.0 D4Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200
Consumption4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.23 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.24 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used705 L186 US gal155 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,234 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S90 2.0 D4

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 576 km (358 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 33 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200

  • Is 346 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S90 2.0 D4
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS902.0 D4vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS902.0 D4vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
C 200
C 180
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180
2.0 D4
20d
VS
VolvoS902.0 D4vsJaguarXF (X260)20d
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200
2.0 D4
D180
VS
VolvoS902.0 D4vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200
2.0 D4
320d
VS
VolvoS902.0 D4vsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
2.0 D4
2.0 Blue dCi
VS
VolvoS902.0 D4vsRenaultTalisman2.0 Blue dCi
C 200
C 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
Volvo S90 2.0 D4 vs Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 200 - car comparison - FastVsFaster