Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 D4vsVolkswagen Passat (B8) · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Passat (B8) · Facelift 2019
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Passat (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,347 km837 mi
- Largest trunk586 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Volvo S90 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions123 g/km
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 D4 | VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,866kg4,114lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,210kg4,872lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 68.7s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.6s Calculated | 28.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,170km727mi Calculated | 1,347km837mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,873mm192in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,786mm110in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 586L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,152L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 123g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Passat (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | - | 5,000 rpm |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 D4 | VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.6 s | 28.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 1,866 kg 4,114 lb |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 8.2 s |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Passat (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Volvo S90 2.0 D4: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 1,170 km 727 mi |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,347 km 837 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.5 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Passat (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 D4 | VolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,866 kg 4,114 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,170 km 727 mi | 1,347 km 837 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 123 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 586 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 D4 | Volkswagen Passat (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 D4
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Passat (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Is 306 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 177 km (110 mi) more estimated range
- Has 86 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























