Volvo C30 · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Volvo C30 · Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20VvsRenault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna Coupe
3.5 V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,508 kg3,325 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range713 km443 mi
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score83/100
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Most powerful238 hp177 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Largest trunk423 L
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,508kg3,325lb | 1,597kg3,521lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,953kg4,306lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 97.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 29.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 713km443mi Calculated | 647km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,266mm168in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,782mm70in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,447mm57in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | - |
| Trunk volume | 278L | 423L |
| Max trunk volume | 921L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 203g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 29.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 230 hp 172 kW |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW |
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V has 8 hp more than Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 1,508 kg 3,325 lb |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 6.7 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 7.4 s |
Although Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V has more power, Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 713 km 443 mi |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 647 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,508 kg 3,325 lb | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 713 km 443 mi | 647 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 203 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V | Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.22 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,284 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
- Is 89 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 66 km (41 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























