Volvo C30 · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Volvo C30 · Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20VvsRenault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna Coupe
3.0 dCi V6 FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range880 km547 mi
- Largest trunk423 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,508 kg3,325 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,508kg3,325lb | 1,705kg3,759lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 91.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 102.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 29.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 713km443mi Calculated | 880km547mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,266mm168in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,782mm70in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,447mm57in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | - |
| Trunk volume | 278L | 423L |
| Max trunk volume | 921L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 203g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 4,400 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 29.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 230 hp 172 kW |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 235 hp 175 kW |
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP has 5 hp more than Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 1,508 kg 3,325 lb |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 6.7 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 7.3 s |
Although Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP has more power, Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP and Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 713 km 443 mi |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 880 km 547 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,508 kg 3,325 lb | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 713 km 443 mi | 880 km 547 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 203 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V | Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.22 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,284 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
- Is 197 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 167 km (104 mi) more estimated range
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























