Renault Laguna Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAPvsRenault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna II
2.0 i 16V GT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score87/100
Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 235hp175kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 102.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.0s Calculated | 29.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 880km547mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,576mm180in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,400mm55in | 1,429mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | - | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,480mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 423L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,330L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 4,400 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.0 s | 29.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 235 hp 175 kW |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW |
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP has 31 hp more than Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP: 31 hp (23 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 7.3 s |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 7.2 s |
Although Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP has more power, Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 235 hp 175 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 880 km 547 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP
- Has 31 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT
- Is 385 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 7 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























