Renault Megane II (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16VvsRenault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna II
2.0 i 16V GT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful224 hp167 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score84/100
Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.5s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 29.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,228mm166in | 4,576mm180in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,436mm57in | 1,429mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,617mm103in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,517mm60in | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,521mm60in | 1,480mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,190L | 1,330L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 29.3 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 224 hp 167 kW |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW |
Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V has 20 hp more than Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT and Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 6.5 s |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























