Porsche Macan I (95B)
Car comparison
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lightest1,880 kg4,145 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions164 g/km
- Best estimated range952 km592 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score90/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 580Nm428lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 1,902kg4,193lb |
| Gross weight | 2,575kg5,677lb | 2,430kg5,357lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 76.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 80.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.9s Calculated | 30.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 952km592mi Calculated | 779km484mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,681mm184in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 4,000-4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.9 s | 30.6 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 258 hp 192 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6 has 8 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 1,902 kg 4,193 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 6.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 952 km 592 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 779 km 484 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.3 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | 1,902 kg 4,193 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 952 km 592 mi | 779 km 484 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Macan I (95B) S 3.0 Diesel V6
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 230 Nm more
- Is 22 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 173 km (108 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 14 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























