Car comparison

Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009 2.9vsVolkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009

2.9

265 hp2893 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2009-2012
VS

Volkswagen Eos

3.6 FSI V6

260 hp3597 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedCoupe2009-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    263 km/h
    163 mph
  • Most powerful
    265 hp
    198 kW
  • Lightest
    1,360 kg
    2,998 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    195 hp/t
    145 kW/t
    5.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Largest trunk
    260 L
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6

  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.2 L/100 km
    17.8 mpg US
    21.4 mpg UK
  • Best practicality score
    43/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
Power
265hp198kW
260hp194kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,360kg2,998lb
1,591kg3,508lb
Gross weight
1,670kg3,682lb
2,070kg4,564lb
Top speed
263 km/h
163 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
91.5s99% target: 260 km/h / 162 mph
Calculated
99.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.7s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
21.8s
25.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.4s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
714km444mi
Calculated
598km371mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,893cc177cu in
3,597cc220cu in
Length
4,347mm171in
4,407mm174in
Width
1,801mm71in
1,791mm71in
Height
1,304mm51in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,415mm95in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,490mm59in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,534mm60in
1,553mm61in
Ground clearance
130mm5in
106mm4in
Trunk volume
260L
183L
Max trunk volume-
358L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
65L
55L
CO2 emissions
214g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6PowerTorque
  • Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.97,200 rpm4,400-6,000 rpm7,500 rpm
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V66,000 rpm2,400-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.4 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.7 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.8 s
25.6 s
Top speed
263 km/h
163 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.0 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
103 mph
157 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
265 hp
198 kW
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
260 hp
194 kW

Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9 has 5 hp more than Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 and Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
1,591 kg
3,508 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
263 km/h
163 mph
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9 and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
195 hp/t
145 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
714 km
444 mi
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
598 km
371 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
265 hp
198 kW
5.7 s
263 km/h
163 mph
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
260 hp
194 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
263 km/h
163 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,347 mm
171.1 in
Height
1,304 mm
51.3 in
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
183 L
6.5 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
263 km/h
163 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
5.7 s
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9
195 hp/t
145 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 20092.9VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6
Power
265 hp
198 kW
260 hp
194 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.7 s
6.9 s
Top speed
263 km/h
163 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
1,591 kg
3,508 lb
Fuel consumption
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,347 mm
171.1 in
Height
1,304 mm
51.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
183 L
6.5 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
714 km
444 mi
598 km
371 mi
CO2 score
214 g/km
-
Trunk score
260 L
9.2 cu ft
183 L
6.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
195 hp/t
145 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
Consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.92 LC100 km16.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.63 LC100 mi25.91 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,389 LC/year2,415 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 2.9

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 231 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 116 km (72 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 77 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6

  • Has 50 Nm more

Pros

  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayman (987C) 2.9
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009 2.9 vs Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster