Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8vsRolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Cullinan
6.7 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed284 km/h176 mph
- Lightest2,235 kg4,927 lb
- Best power-to-weight255 hp/t190 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions267 g/km
- Largest trunk670 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
- Most powerful571 hp426 kW
- Highest torque850 Nm627 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 570hp425kW | 571hp426kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 850Nm627lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,235kg4,927lb | 2,660kg5,864lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | - |
| Top speed | 284 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.6s99% target: 281 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.0s Calculated | 19.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | 22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 215hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 870km540mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,806cc293cu in | 6,749cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,855mm191in | 5,341mm210in |
| Width | 1,954mm77in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,702mm67in | 1,835mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 3,295mm130in |
| Front track | 1,661mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,675mm66in | - |
| Trunk volume | 670L | 526L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 267g/km | 341g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 5,000 rpm | 1,600 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.0 s | 19.0 s |
| Top speed | 284 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 570 hp 425 kW |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW |
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 has 1 hp more than Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 284 km/h 176 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 4.1 s |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 5.2 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 has more power, Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 3.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 570 hp 425 kW | 4.1 s | 284 km/h 176 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
| 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 570 hp 425 kW | 571 hp 426 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 284 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 870 km 540 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 267 g/km | 341 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | 526 L 18.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 | Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 26.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 3,938 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8
- Is 425 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 144 L more trunk volume
- Emits 74 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























